I'll start with the uncomfortable part: astrology has no predictive validity demonstrated by scientific methods. I say this as someone who uses it every day for work. Not because I want to cover myself, but because it's the truth and because any serious client will ask sooner or later, and I'd rather answer before they ask.

What astrology does have — along with numerology, tarot and feng shui — is a framework of cycles. And it's no coincidence that I give this so much weight: statistics was one of my favorite subjects at university, and I kept studying advanced statistics tools and astrostatistics on my own long after graduating. A cycle framework is, above all, a system that organizes time into repeatable patterns and helps identify which combination of factors explains most of what happens. That isn't magic, it's structure.

A good strategic model doesn't predict the future with certainty either; it organizes variables so you can decide with more judgment than you would have looking at chaos with no filter at all. It's the same logic you already use without questioning it when you check the weather forecast before an important event, or when you trust stock-market technical analysis: neither guarantees the result, but both organize the decision.

To that technical base I add the intuitive reading I've been training all my life, specific to my natal chart: it's that combination, and not either one alone, that allows me to help each client recognize the options they already deserve to have on the table.

My method calculates techniques completely independently of one another, each with its own logic. I only flag a period when several of those techniques converge on the same theme, separately, not because I force them to coincide. I have calibrated my method with fifty randomly chosen charts and with former clients.

Every period I flag carries a question that is answered with a yes or a no when the period closes. I record the hits and the misses, without filtering out the ones that don't suit me. I don't yet publish a hit rate: I'd rather measure it over time before putting a number on it.